Newly Arrived Migrant Students’ perceptions of second language learning conditions in Emergency Remote Teaching: the case of Flanders
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51751/dujal18339Keywords:
Newly Arrived Migrant Students, language learning, Emergency Remote Teaching, Covid-19, focus groupsAbstract
When Newly Arrived Migrant Students (NAMS) enter their country of arrival, they are expected to get familiarized with the new educational system, while simultaneously acquiring the language of instruction. Within this context, comprehensible input and meaningful interaction are needed to effectively acquire a second language. While educational systems worldwide switched to Emergency Remote Teaching due to the outbreak of COVID-19 in 2020, such online learning environments often fail to meet these language learning conditions adequately. We investigated NAMS’ perceptions of second language learning conditions during online learning through six semi-structured focus groups with 23 NAMS. Results show that participants encountered greater difficulties in understanding their teachers’ input in online classes. Although alternative input channels, such as video recordings, reportedly did not entirely compensate the lack of interaction in the online environment, participants believed that processing alternative sources of input enabled them to maintain their Dutch proficiency through Emergency Remote Teaching.
Downloads
References
AGODI. (2020). Rapport onthaalonderwijs: 2016-2018 en 2017-2018 [Reception education report: 2016-2018 and 2017-2018]. AGODI: Agentschap voor Onderwijsdiensten. https://publicaties.vlaanderen.be/view-file/41948
AGODI. (2023). Cijfers en rapporten over het onthaalonderwijs [Numbers and reports on reception education]. AGODI: Agentschap voor Onderwijsdiensten. https://onderwijs.vlaanderen.be/nl/anderstalige-nieuwkomers-en-onderwijs/cijfers-en-rapporten-over-het-onthaalonderwijs
Aguliera, E., & Nightengale-Lee, B. (2020). Emergency remote teaching across urban and rural contexts: Perspectives on educational equity. Information and Learning Sciences, 121(5/6), 471–478. https://doi.org/10.1108/ILS-04-2020-0100
Bailey, F., & Kadhum Fahad, A. (2021). Krashen Revisited: Case Study of the Role of Input, Motivation and Identity in Second Language Learning. Arab World English Journal, 12(2), 540–550. https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol12no2.36
de Vos, J. F., Schriefers, H., Nivard, M. G., & Lemhöfer, K. (2018). A Meta-Analysis and Meta-Regression of Incidental Second Language Word Learning from Spoken Input: Meta-Analysis: Incidental L2 Spoken Word Learning. Language Learning, 68(4), 906–941. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12296
Drane, C. F., Vernon, L., & O’Shea, S. (2020). Vulnerable learners in the age of COVID-19: A scoping review. The Australian Educational Researcher, 48, 585–604. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-020-00409-5
Ellis, R. (1994). The Study of Second Language Acquisition. Oxford University Press.
Emery, L. (2022). New to the game. A system analysis of the orientation process of newly arrived migrant students in Flemish secondary education. Vrije Universiteit Brussel & Universiteit Gent.
Emery, L., Spruyt, B., Boone, S., & Van Avermaet, P. (2020). The educational trajectory of Newly Arrived Migrant Students: Insights from a structural analysis of cultural capital. Educational Research. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131881.2020.1713021
European Commission. Directorate General for Education and Culture. & Public Policy and Management Institute. (2013). Study on educational support for newly arrived migrant children. Publications Office. https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2766/41204
Evans, M., & Liu, Y. (2018). The Unfamiliar and the Indeterminate: Language, Identity and Social Integration in the School Experience of Newly-Arrived Migrant Children in England. Journal of Language, Identity & Education, 17(3), 152–167. https://doi.org/10.1080/15348458.2018.1433043
Eynde, C. V. (2013). Advies over het onthaalonderwijs voor anderstalige nieuwkomers [Advice on reception education for newly arrived migrants]. 22.
Flege, J. E. (2008). Give Input a Chance! In T. Piske & M. Young-Scholten (Eds.), Input Matters in SLA (pp. 175–190). Multilingual Matters. https://doi.org/10.21832/9781847691118-012
Gass, S. M., & Mackey, A. (2006). Input, Interaction and Output: An Overview. AILA Review, 19, 3–17. https://doi.org/10.1075/aila.19.03gas
Harsch, C., Müller-Karabil, A., & Buchminskaia, E. (2021). Addressing the challenges of interaction in online language courses. System, 103, 102673. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2021.102673
Hodges, C., Moore, S., Lockee, B., Trust, T., & Bond, A. (2020). The Difference Between Emergency Remote Teaching and Online Learning. EDUCAUSE. https://er.educause.edu/articles/2020/3/the-difference-between-emergency-remote-teaching-and-online-learning
Kemper, R., Bradt, L., Keygnaert, I., Pulinx, R., Van Avermaet, P., & Derluyn, I. (2022). Separating newcomers: Pragmatism or ideology? Schools’ responses to newly arrived migrants in Flanders. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 26(6), 622–641. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2020.1711537
Kim, Y. (2017). Cognitive-Interactionist Approaches to L2 Instruction. In S. Loewen & M. Sato, The Routledge Handbook of Instructed Second Language Acquisition. Routledge.
Kohnke, L., & Moorhouse, B. L. (2022). Facilitating Synchronous Online Language Learning through Zoom. RELC Journal, 53(1), 296–301. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688220937235
Krashen, S. (1992). The Input Hypothesis: An update. In J. E. Alatis, Georgetown University Round Table on Languages and Linguistics (GURT) 1991: Linguistics and Language Pedagogy: The State of the Art (pp. 409–431). Georgetown University Press.
Krashen, S. D. (1985). The input hypothesis: Issues and implications. Longman.
Kryshtanovych, S., Chorna-Klymovets, I., Semeriak, I., Mordous, I., & Zainchkivska, I. (2022). Modern Technologies for the Development of Distance Education. International Journal of Computer Science and Network Security, 22(9), 103–108. https://doi.org/10.22937/IJCSNS.2022.22.9.16
Lichtman, K., & VanPatten, B. (2021). Was Krashen right? Forty years later. Foreign Language Annals, 54(2), 283–305. https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12552
Loewen, S. (2021). Was Krashen right? An instructed second language acquisition perspective. Foreign Language Annals, 54(2), 311–317. https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12550
Long, M. H. (1996). The Role of the Linguistic Environment in Second Language Acquisition. In M. Thomas, W. C. Ritchie, & T. K. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of Second Language Acquisition (pp. 413–468). Elsevier. https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/B9780125890427500153
Luan, N. L., & Sappathy, S. M. (2011). L2 Vocabulary Acquisition: The Impact of Negotiated Interaction. 11(2), 5-20.
Mackey, A. (1999). Input, Interaction and Second Language Development: An Empirical Study of Question Formation in ESL. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21(4), 557–587. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263199004027
Maenhout, K. (2020). Herfstvakantie verlengd, deeltijds afstandsonderwijs verplicht [Halfterm prolonged, parttime distance education compulsory]. De Standaard. https://www.standaard.be/cnt/dmf20201030_97719250
Manegre, M., & Sabiri, K. A. (2022). Online language learning using virtual classrooms: An analysis of teacher perceptions. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 35(5–6), 973–988. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2020.1770290
McMullin, C. (2023). Transcription and Qualitative Methods: Implications for Third Sector Research. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 34(1), 140–153. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-021-00400-3
Moser, K. M., Wei, T., & Brenner, D. (2021). Remote teaching during COVID-19: Implications from a national survey of language educators. System, 97, 102431. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2020.102431
Namaziandost, E., & Nasri, M. (2019). A Meticulous Look at Long’s (1981) Interaction Hypothesis. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Language Research, 6(2), 218-230.
OECD. (2018). The Resilience of Students with an Immigrant Background: Factors that Shape Well-being. OECD. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264292093-en
Paradis, J. (2018, September 7). The L2 acquisition of children from migrant backgrounds: How age, L1, input and cognitive factors shape this process. EuroSLA, Münster.
QSR International Pty Ltd. (2020). NVivo (Version 12) [Computer software]. https://www.qsrinternational.com/nvivo-qualitative-data-analysis-software/home
Ramaut, G. (2002). Een aparte aanpak? De opvang van ex-onthaalklassers in het reguliere secundair onderwijs [A seperate approach? The integration of ex-newly arrived migrants in mainstream secondary education]. Vonk, 32(2), 3-21.
Ravn, S., Nouwen, W., Clycq, D. N., & Timmerman, D. C. (2018). Refugee Education in Flanders (p. 59). SIRIUS ‐ Policy Network on Migrant Education.
Saito, K., & Hanzawa, K. (2018). The role of input in second language oral ability development in foreign language classrooms: A longitudinal study. Language Teaching Research, 22(4), 398–417. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168816679030
Saito, K., Suzuki, S., Oyama, T., & Akiyama, Y. (2021). How does longitudinal interaction promote second language speech learning? Roles of learner experience and proficiency levels. Second Language Research, 37(4), 547–571. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658319884981
Saud Alahmadi, N., & Muslim Alraddadi, B. (2020). The Impact of Virtual Classes on Second Language Interaction in the Saudi EFL Context: A Case Study of Saudi Undergraduate Students. Arab World English Journal, 11(3), 56–72. https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol11no3.4
Seynhaeve, S., Deygers, B., & Simon, E. (2022). Newly arrived migrant students’ perceptions of emergency remote teaching: A Q methodology study. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 3, 10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2022.100169
Seynhaeve, S., Deygers, B., Simon, E., & Delarue, S. (2022). Interaction in online classes during Covid-19: The experiences of newly-arrived migrant students. Educational Research, 64(3), 334–352. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131881.2022.2090981
Souzanzan, R., & Bagheri, M. S. (2017). Hybrid Learning: The Impact of Interacting Through Skype on Iranian Learners’ Speaking Ability. Information Technologies and Learning Tools, 58(2), 118–128. https://doi.org/10.33407/itlt.v58i2.1551
Sterckx, M. (2006). Wat is er nog van onze dromen? Eindrapport van een onderzoek naar de doorstroming van anderstalige nieuwkomers in het secundair onderwijs in de eerste drie jaar na de onthaalklas in Vlaanderen (2003—2005) [What is left of our dreams? Final report of a study into the progression of non-Dutch speaking newcomers in secondary education in the first three years after reception education in Flanders (2003-2005)]. (p. 93). Centrum voor Taal en Onderwijs.
Terhart, H., & von Dewitz, N. (2018). Newly arrived migrant students in German schools: Exclusive and inclusive structures and practices. European Educational Research Journal, 17(2), 290–304. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474904117722623
Thomas, N., Lucski, G., & McCulloch, E. (2021). Resilience in the face of emergency remote teaching: EAL pupils’ experiences during the COVID-19 pandemic. TESOL Journal, 12(2). https://doi.org/10.1002/tesj.591
Van Avermaet, P., Derluyn, I., De Maeyer, S., Vandommele, G., Van Gorp, K., Pulinx, R., Kemper, R., Verswijvel, K., De Bruyne, L., Van Thournout, G., Baeten, M., & Keygnaert, I. (2017). Cartografie en analyse van het onthaalonderwijs voor minderjarige anderstalige nieuwkomers (OKANS) [Cartography and analysis of reception education for minor newly arrived migrants (OKANS)]. UGent, UAntwerpen, KULeuven.
Vanblaere, B. (2012). Ervaringen van ex-OKAN-leerlingen in het secundair onderwijs [Experiences of ex-newly arrived migrant students in secondary education]. [Master’s thesis]. Universiteit Gent.
Vandecandelaere, M. (2020). Flexibele leerwegen voor meertalige nieuwkomers in het basis- en secundair onderwijs [Flexible learning paths for multilingual newcomers in primary and secondary education]. LannooCampus; Leuven. https://lirias.kuleuven.be/3218851
Wu, S.-Y. (2021). How Teachers Conduct Online Teaching During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Case Study of Taiwan. Frontiers in Education, 6, 675434. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2021.675434
Yen, Y. C., Hou, H.-T., & Chang, K.-E. (2013). Applying Skype in English as a Foreign Language Instruction: Effect on Students’ Speaking Errors. In J.-F. Wang & R. Lau (Eds.), Advances in Web-Based Learning – ICWL 2013 (Vol. 8167, pp. 312–319). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41175-5_32
Zhang, R., & Zou, D. (2022). Types, purposes, and effectiveness of state-of-the-art technologies for second and foreign language learning. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 35(4), 696–742. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2020.1744666
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Shauny Seynhaeve
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
