Gatekeeping and gate-opening: Ethical and reflexive research with LESLLA stakeholders
A response to “Why should I care? Research ethics in the field of adult L2 literacy”
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51751/dujal24695Keywords:
Adult literacy, informed consent, LESLLA, reflexivity, research ethicsAbstract
With their self-reflective article and vignettes, Shepperd and Dalderop provide valuable insights into their personal quest for ethical and reflexive research and make an important contribution to research ethics in applied linguistics. In our viewpoint, we would like to elaborate on their reflections on informed consent and voluntary participation by providing our thoughts on potential gate-openers/ gate-opening in LESLLA research. Their article considers three core areas of ethical care (consent, participation and minimising harm while optimising beneficence) to be exercised in LESLLA research and frames these as “layers of vulnerability” (see Luna, 2019). Similarly to Shepperd and Dalderop, we navigated these layers of vulnerability in our individual LESLLA research contexts in Norway (Live), Australia (Skye and Jemima) and Finland (Eva) through various institutional and research gatekeepers and will discuss relevant personal and contextualized reflections of our own in this viewpoint.
Downloads
References
Allwright, D. (2005). Developing principles for practitioner research: The case of exploratory practice. Modern Language Journal, 89(3), 353–366. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2005.00310.x
Allwright, D., & Hanks, J. (2009). The developing language learner: An introduction to Exploratory Practice. Palgrave Macmillan.
Altherr Flores, J. A. (2021). The semiotics of writing: How adult L2 learners with emergent literacy make meaning in assessment texts through writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 51, 100793. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2021.100793
Alvesson, M., Sandberg, J., & Einola, K. (2022). Reflexive design in qualitative research. In U. Flick (Ed.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research design (pp. 1–28). Sage.
Annamma, S. A. (2018). Mapping consequential geographies in the carceral state: Education Journey Mapping as a qualitative method with girls of color with dis/abilities. Qualitative Inquiry, 24(1), 20–34. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1077800417728962
Boufarss, M., & Harviainen, J. T. (2021). Librarians as gate-openers in open access publishing: A case study in the United Arab Emirates. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 47(5), Article 102425. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2021.102425
Consoli, S., & Ganassin, S. (2025). Reflexivity as a means to address researcher vulnerabilities. Applied Linguistics Review. https://doi.org/10.1515/applirev-2024-0268
De Costa, P. I. (2024). What’s ethics got to do with applied linguistics? Revisiting the past, considering the present, and being optimistic about the future of our field. Research Methods in Applied Linguistics, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rmal.2024.100103
Fenwick, T., & Edwards, R. (2013). Performative ontologies Sociomaterial approaches to researching adult education and lifelong learning. European Journal for Research on the Education and Learning of Adults, 4(1), 49–63. https://doi.org/10.3384/rela.2000-7426.rela0104
Fenwick, T., & Edwards, R. (2018). Critique and Politics: A sociomaterialist intervention. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 47(13–14), 1385–1404. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2014.930681
Futch, V. A., & Fine, M. (2014). Mapping as a method: History and theoretical commitments. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 11(1), 42–59. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2012.719070
Grinden, L., & Botha, L. (2025). Learning performatively for research with marginalized populations: Developing informed consent with LESLLA learners. Journal of Applied Social Science, 19(2), 147–164. https://doi.org/10.1177/19367244241307565
Hultin, L. (2019). On becoming a sociomaterial researcher: Exploring epistemological practices grounded in a relational, performative ontology. Information and Organization, 29, 91–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoandorg.2019.04.004
Hurley, M. (2007). Who’s on whose margins? In M. Pitts & A. Smith (Eds.), Researching the margins: Strategies for ethical and rigorous research with marginalised communities (pp. 160–189). Palgrave Macmillan UK. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230224476_9
Kubanyiova, M. (2012). Ethical debates in research on language and interaction. In C. Chapelle (Ed.), The encyclopedia of applied linguistics. Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405198431.wbeal0392
Luna, F. (2019). Identifying and evaluating layers of vulnerability – a way forward. Bioethics, 19(2), 86–95. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/dewb.12206
Mackenzie, C., McDowell, C., & Pittaway, E. (2007). Beyond "do no harm": The challenge of constructing ethical relationships in refugee research. Journal of Refugee Studies, 20(2), 299–319. https://doi.org/10.1093/jrs/fem008
Malessa, E. (2025a). Redesigning a serious game app with LESLLA teachers for adult migrant second language and literacy learners: Enhancing accessibility and usability. EDeR. Educational Design Research, 9(2). https://doi.org/10.15460/eder.9.2.2348
Malessa, E. (2025b). Access to (M)ALL: Redesigning a literacy support serious game app in a participatory design approach with Finnish language and literacy teachers of adult migrants with limited/interrupted formal education. JYU Dissertations, 905. [Doctoral dissertation, University of Jyväskylä]. https://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-952-86-0587-4
Malessa, E. (2023a). Enhancing ethical research participation and inclusion of marginalized adult migrant Learners: An early career researcher’s perspective. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 24(3). https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-24.3.4100
Malessa, E. (2023b). Technology-enhanced or technology-exhausted learning in adult migrant literacy education in Finland: Exploring teachers’ experiences and views in pre-pandemic and pandemic times. International Journal of Technology in Education and Science, 7(2), 104–128. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijtes.437
Malessa, E. (2023c). How Covid-19 intruded and improved my applied LESLLA research in progress: Reflections on research-design and research ethics of an empirical serious game study on L2 literacy support of adult migrants in Finland. LESLLA Symposium Proceedings, 17(1), 111–126. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8075621
Marx, S. (2022). Mapping as critical qualitative research methodology. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 46(3), 285–299. https://doi.org/10.1080/1743727X.2022.2110231
McCurdy, S. G. (2024). “You just have to teach it differently”: English language teachers’ practice and knowledge of pronunciation instruction [Doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota]. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses. https://www.proquest.com/docview/3082038701/abstract/B684522B11284F33PQ/1
Pennycook, A. (2018). Posthumanist applied linguistics. Applied Linguistics 39(4), 445–61. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amw016
Perry, K. H., & Mallozzi, C. A. (2015). "Who gets to say?" Political and ethical dilemmas for researchers in educational linguistics. In M. Bigelow & J. Enser-Kananen (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of educational linguistics (pp. 397–413). Routledge.
Playsted, S. (2022). They have lessons to teach me: Critical reflection and autoethnography in an Australian adult migrant English program. In E. A. Anteliz, D. L. Mulligan, & P. A. Danaher (Eds.), The Routledge international handbook of autoethnography in educational research (pp. 317–325). Routledge.
Playsted, S., Thomas, D. P., & Wilkinson, J. (2024). Exploratory practice puzzling as praxis-oriented pronunciation teacher learning in Australian adult migrant EAL education. Language Teaching Research, 0(0). https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688241304648
Playsted, S., & Thomas, D. (2025). “I look at it differently now, but differently in a good way”: Developing dispositions for teaching pronunciation through a research-practice partnership in Australian adult migrant education. In S.-W. Chong, H. Reinders, & Q. Liu (Eds.), Research-practice partnerships in language education. Palgrave Macmillan.
Rillera Kempster, J. (2023). Digital poetry for adult English learners with limited
education: Possibilities in language learning, literacy development and
interculturality. TESOL in Context, 31(2), 5–22. https://doi.org/10.21153/tesol2023vol31no2art1727
Rodrick Beiler, I., & Dewilde, J. (2025). "“When we use that kind of language… someone is going to jail”: Relationality and aesthetic interpretation in initial research encounters" Applied Linguistics Review, 16(2), 609–628. https://doi.org/10.1515/applirev-2024-0085
Toohey, K. (2019). The onto-epistemologies of new materialism: Implications for applied linguistics pedagogies and research. Applied Linguistics, 40(6), 937–56. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amy046
Watson, J. (2019). Understanding Indigenous education practices as a way of engaging deeply with refugee-background students (and everyone else) in the classroom. European Journal of Applied Linguistics and TEFL, 8(1), 203–224.
Published
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Eva Malessa, Skye Playsted, Jemima Rillera Kempster, Live Grinden
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
