Accessibility, researcher training, and sampling: A care-ful approach

A response to “Why should I care? Research ethics in the field of adult L2 literacy”

Author(s)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51751/dujal24880

Keywords:

research ethics, questionable research practices, research methods

Abstract

In this contribution, we argue that our research should matter to the people we collect data from. This requires us to consider how we publish our results, how we educate scholars within our community, and how we sample from various populations.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Andringa, S., Mos, M., van Beuningen, C., González, P., Hornikx, J., & Steinkrauss, R. (2024). Diamond is a scientist’s best friend: Counteracting systemic inequality in open access publishing. Dutch Journal of Applied Linguistics, 13. https://doi.org/10.51751/dujal18802

Antes, A. L., Murphy, S. T., Waples, E. P., Mumford, M. D., Brown, R. P., Connelly, S., & Devenport, L. D. (2009). A meta-analysis of ethics instruction effectiveness in the sciences. Ethics & Behavior, 19(5), 379–402. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508420903035380

De Costa, P. I., Rabie-Ahmed, A., & Cinaglia, C. (Eds.). (2024). Ethical issues in applied linguistics scholarship. John Benjamins Publishing Company.

Guillemin, M., & Gillam, L. (2004). Ethics, reflexivity, and “ethically important moments” in research. Qualitative Inquiry, 10(2), 261–280. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800403262360

Isbell, D. R., Brown, D., Chen, M., Derrick, D. J., Ghanem, R., Arvizu, M. N. G., Schnur, E., Zhang, M., & Plonsky, L. (2022). Misconduct and questionable research practices: The ethics of quantitative data handling and reporting in applied linguistics. The Modern Language Journal, 106(1), 172–195. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12760

Jenks, C. J. (2025). Circular applied linguistics: A model for impactful, inclusive, and sustainable research. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 35(1), 420-435. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijal.12628

Kubanyiova, M. (2008). Rethinking research ethics in contemporary applied linguistics: The tension between macroethical and microethical perspectives in situated research. The Modern Language Journal, 92(4), 503–518. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2008.00784.x

Larsson, T., Plonsky, L., Sterling, S., Kytö, M., Yaw, K., & Wood, M. (2023). On the frequency, prevalence, and perceived severity of questionable research practices. Research Methods in Applied Linguistics, 2(3), 100064. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rmal.2023.100064

Plonsky, L. (Ed.) (2024). Open science in applied linguistics. Applied Linguistics Press.

Shepperd, L. & Dalderop, K. (in press). Why should I care? Research ethics in the field of adult L2 Literacy. Dutch Journal of Applied Linguistics

Wagner, L., & McKee, C. (2023). How to talk language science with everybody (1st ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108894227

Wood, M., Sterling, S., Larsson, T., Plonsky, L., Kytö, M., & Yaw, K. (2024). Researchers Training researchers: Ethics training in quantitative applied linguistics. TESOL Quarterly, 59, 1817-1833. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.3323

Yaw, K., Larsson, T., Plonsky, L., Sterling, S., & Kytö, M. (forthcoming). Mentoring ethically-reflexive quantitative researchers in Applied Linguistics.

Yaw, K., Plonsky, L., Larsson, T., Sterling, S., & Kytö, M. (2023). Research ethics in applied linguistics. Language Teaching, 56(4), 478–494. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444823000010

Downloads

Published

24-03-2026

Issue

Section

Viewpoints

Categories

How to Cite

Sterling, S., Kytö, M., Plonsky, L., Yaw, K., & Larsson, T. (2026). Accessibility, researcher training, and sampling: A care-ful approach: A response to “Why should I care? Research ethics in the field of adult L2 literacy”. Dutch Journal of Applied Linguistics, 15. https://doi.org/10.51751/dujal24880