Het belang van taalkeuze voor het sociaal kapitaal in Nederland
Authors
-
Hans Schmeets
Maastricht University
-
Leonie Cornips
Universiteit Maastricht / NL-Lab KNAW
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2408-6083
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51751/dujal13267Keywords:
sociaal kapitaal, vertrouwen, participatie, meertaligheid, survey, social capital, participation, trust, multilingualismAbstract
This article focuses on how language choice and how the language (variety) spoken at home contributes to social capital in the Netherlands. Social capital is measured using 17 participation and trust indicators, based on a representative Dutch national survey on social cohesion and well-being among more than 7,500 people aged 15 years or older in 2019. Our study shows that if a dialect or the regional language Low Saxon is most often spoken at home, individuals’ trust level is lower, while participation is higher compared to the group that most often uses Dutch at home. Limburgish and Frisian are not related to trust and/or participation. Crucially, this study reveals that the social capital index overall is not related to language but the two parts of it: trust and participation.
Downloads
References
Androutsopoulos, J. (2015). Networked multilingualism: Some language practices on Facebook and their implications. International Journal of Bilingualism, 19(2), 185–205.
Berger-Schmitt, R. (2002). Considering social cohesion in quality of life assessments: Concept and measurement. Social Indicators Research, 58, 403–428.
Beauvais, C., & Jenson, J. (2002). Social cohesion: Updating the state of the research. Ottawa: Canadian Policy Research Networks.
Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In: J. Richardson (red.), Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 241–258.
Bourdieu, P. (1991). Language and symbolic power. Cambridge: Polity Press in association with Basil Blackwell.
Brock, A., Kwakernaak, M., de Meere, F. en H. Boutellier (2019). Literatuurstudie Sociale Cohesie. Utrecht: Verwey Jonker Instituut (zie https://www.verwey‑jonker.nl/wp‑content/uploads/2022/09/118050_Literatuurstudie_sociale_cohesie.pdf)
CBS, StatLine (2022). Sociale contacten en maatschappelijke participatie. https://opendata.cbs.nl/statline/#/CBS/nl/dataset/82249NED/table?ts=1666875560289
Clark, T. (2006) Language as social capital. Applied Semiotics = Semiotique Appliquee, 8 (18). pp. 29–41.
Coleman, J.S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94, 94–120.
Coleman, J.S. (1990). Foundations of social theory. Cambridge, Mass: Belknap Press.
Cornips, L. (2014). Taalcultuur: Talen in beweging. Taal & Tongval, 65(2), 125–147.
Cornips, L., Rooij, V. de & Stengs, I.L. (2012). Carnavalesk taalgebruik en de constructie van lokale identiteiten. Dutch Journal of Applied Linguistics, 1(1), 15–40.
Coté, S. & Healy, T. (2001). The well-being of nations. The role of human and social capital. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
De Swaan, A. (2001). Words of the world: The global language system. Cambridge: Polity Press and Blackwell.
Eckert, P. (2012). Three Waves of Variation Study: The Emergence of Meaning in the Study of Sociolinguistic Variation. Annual Review of Anthropology, 41, 87–100.
Eliasoph, L. (1998). Avoiding politics: How Americans Produce Apathy in Everyday Life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gannon, B., & Roberts, J. (2018). Social capital: exploring the theory and empirical divide. Empirical Economics https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181‑018‑1556‑y
Hoff, S., Vrooman, C., Iedema, J., Boelhouwer, J., Kullberg, J. (2021). Verschil in Nederland 2014–2020. Zes sociale klassen en hun visies op samenleving en politiek. Den Haag: SCP
Jeannotte, S. (2000). Social cohesion around the world: An international comparison of definitions and issues. Hull, Strategic Research and Analysis Directorate.
Keeley, B. (2007). Human capital: how what you know shapes your life. Paris: OECD.
Kearns, A., & Forrest, R. (2000). Social cohesion and multilevel urban governance. Urban Studies, 37(5–6), 995–1017.
Knack, S., & Keefer, P. (1997). Does social capital have an economic pay-off? A cross country investigation. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112 (4), 1251–1288.
Neira, I., Vázquez, E., & Portela, M. (2009). An Empirical Analysis of Social Capital and Economic Growth in Europe. Social Indicators Research, 92(1), 111–129.
Paxton, P. (1999). Is Social Capital Declining in the United States? A Multiple Indicator Assessment, American Journal of Sociology, 105(1), 88–127.
Portela, M., Neira, I., & del Mar Salinas-Jiménez, M. (2013). Social Capital and Subjective Wellbeing in Europe: A New Approach on Social Capital, Social Indicators Research, 114, 493–511. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11205‑012‑0158‑x
Pozzo, M. (2022). Language playfulness of contextual navigators. Young refugees’ linguistic strategies for inclusion in the Netherlands. Unpubl. Diss, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam.
Putnam, R. (1995). Turning in, turning out: the strange disappearance of social capital in America. Political Science and Politics, (28), 664–683.
Putnam, R.D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York, Simon & Schuster.
Schmeets, H. (2008). Speerpunt Sociale samenhang. Project brief. Heerlen/Voorburg: CBS.
Schmeets, H. (red.) (2015). Sociale samenhang. Wat ons bindt en verdeelt. Den Haag/Heerlen/Bonaire: CBS.
Schmeets, H. (2018a). Vertrouwen op de kaart. Statistische Trends, mei 2018, 1–24.
Schmeets, H. (2018b). Participatie op de kaart. Statistische Trends, september 2018, 1–23.
Schmeets, H., & Cornips, L. (2021). Talen en dialecten in Nederland: Wat spreken we thuis en wat schrijven we op sociale media? Statistische Trends, 5(23), 1–19.
Schmeets, H., & Cornips, L. (2022). Taaldiversiteit in Nederland. TAAL & TONGVAL(74) 1, 75–106. https://doi.org/10.5117/TET2022.1.004.SCHMS
Schmeets, H., & Exel, J. (2022). Vertrouwen in medemens en instituties voor en tijdens de pandemie, Statistische Trends, januari 2022.
Schmeets, H. (2022). De Heitjes en het sociaal kapitaal in Heerlen. CBS: Den Haag/Heerlen/Bonaire, 19 oktober 2022.
Schmeets, H., Francisco Conceicao, J., & Marcellino, C. (2021). Het vertrouwen van immigranten in de samenleving in relatie tot hun verblijfsduur, Statistische Trends, augustus 2021. https://www.cbs.nl/item?sc_itemid=f0c8f2ca‑26bb‑47b4‑91d9‑04887cc72528&sc_lang=nl‑nl
Schmeets, H., Marcellino, C., & Francisco Conceicao, J. (2021). De relevantie van verblijfsduur van immigranten voor hun participatie in de samenleving, Statistische Trends, december 2021. https://www.cbs.nl/nl‑nl/longread/statistische‑trends/2021/de‑relevantie‑van‑verblijfsduur‑vanimmigranten‑voor‑hun‑participatie‑in‑de‑samenleving
Stiglitz, J.E., Sen, A., & Fitoussi, J.-P. (2009). Report by the Commissions on the Measurement of Economic Performance and Social Progress. (www.stiglitz‑sen‑fitoussi.fr.)
Van Beuningen, J., & Schmeets, H. (2013). Developing a Social Capital Index for the Netherlands, Social Indicators Research, 113(3), 859–886. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11205‑012‑0129‑2
Van der Meer, T. (2009). States of freely associating citizens: comparative studies into the impact of state institutions on social, civic and political participation. ICS-dissertatie. Nijmegen: Radboud Universiteit Nijmegen.
Woolcock M. (1998). Social capital and economic development. Theory and Society, 27(2), 151–208.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Hans Schmeets, Leonie Cornips
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
